<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 36 Stunning Examples of Landscape Photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smashandpeas.com/36-stunning-examples-of-landscape-photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smashandpeas.com/36-stunning-examples-of-landscape-photography/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:30:14 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Owen G</title>
		<link>http://www.smashandpeas.com/36-stunning-examples-of-landscape-photography/#comment-8553</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 12:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smashandpeas.com/?p=1629#comment-8553</guid>
		<description>They are incredible but they look a lil over photoshopped</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are incredible but they look a lil over photoshopped</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.smashandpeas.com/36-stunning-examples-of-landscape-photography/#comment-7445</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smashandpeas.com/?p=1629#comment-7445</guid>
		<description>Thank you for posting these images!  They are incredible.  I am not a fan of photos that look overly photoshopped and I most of these really don&#039;t seem that way to me.  I have been getting inspired by Peter Lik&#039;s landscapes.  Check out his blog if you haven&#039;t already: http://blog.peterlik.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for posting these images!  They are incredible.  I am not a fan of photos that look overly photoshopped and I most of these really don&#8217;t seem that way to me.  I have been getting inspired by Peter Lik&#8217;s landscapes.  Check out his blog if you haven&#8217;t already: <a href="http://blog.peterlik.com/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.peterlik.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit</title>
		<link>http://www.smashandpeas.com/36-stunning-examples-of-landscape-photography/#comment-7240</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smashandpeas.com/?p=1629#comment-7240</guid>
		<description>i dnt think all the images are post processed few of them are just so mesmerizing n its really possible on the twilight time its also possible with the polarizer filters. nice viewing all the images..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dnt think all the images are post processed few of them are just so mesmerizing n its really possible on the twilight time its also possible with the polarizer filters. nice viewing all the images..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domenico</title>
		<link>http://www.smashandpeas.com/36-stunning-examples-of-landscape-photography/#comment-6607</link>
		<dc:creator>Domenico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smashandpeas.com/?p=1629#comment-6607</guid>
		<description>Is it still photography?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it still photography?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mktedman</title>
		<link>http://www.smashandpeas.com/36-stunning-examples-of-landscape-photography/#comment-6483</link>
		<dc:creator>mktedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smashandpeas.com/?p=1629#comment-6483</guid>
		<description>2 photoshop or not that is the question. I use to use film and would often be let down by the post processing so photoshop gives back control</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 photoshop or not that is the question. I use to use film and would often be let down by the post processing so photoshop gives back control</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Brodie</title>
		<link>http://www.smashandpeas.com/36-stunning-examples-of-landscape-photography/#comment-6451</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Brodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smashandpeas.com/?p=1629#comment-6451</guid>
		<description>I believe PS is just another tool in the art process. If we look at a painting do we scorn the overt use of colour or manipulation of what was real. In the same sense a photographic artist uses all the available tools to create art - whether it be minimalist or use of colour to create what THAT PERSON wants. It is art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe PS is just another tool in the art process. If we look at a painting do we scorn the overt use of colour or manipulation of what was real. In the same sense a photographic artist uses all the available tools to create art &#8211; whether it be minimalist or use of colour to create what THAT PERSON wants. It is art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bodatnow</title>
		<link>http://www.smashandpeas.com/36-stunning-examples-of-landscape-photography/#comment-5619</link>
		<dc:creator>bodatnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smashandpeas.com/?p=1629#comment-5619</guid>
		<description>I see nothing wrong with photoshop processing. It&#039;s the end result that counts. Use you judgment to decide if photoshop enhances or spoils the image. Can anyone pinpoint the true reason why there seems to be, among some photographers, and deep dislike and mistrust for using photoshop as another interesting tool?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see nothing wrong with photoshop processing. It&#8217;s the end result that counts. Use you judgment to decide if photoshop enhances or spoils the image. Can anyone pinpoint the true reason why there seems to be, among some photographers, and deep dislike and mistrust for using photoshop as another interesting tool?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.smashandpeas.com/36-stunning-examples-of-landscape-photography/#comment-5394</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smashandpeas.com/?p=1629#comment-5394</guid>
		<description>many of these are beautiful shots but from our long experience in the businesses are unfortunately equit over photoshopped! This isn&#039;t to say it&#039;s a problem - a lot of shops both online and off tend to like the &quot;glossy&quot; nature of heavily post-processed pictures, but many other people like to see genuine &quot;organic&quot; pictures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>many of these are beautiful shots but from our long experience in the businesses are unfortunately equit over photoshopped! This isn&#8217;t to say it&#8217;s a problem &#8211; a lot of shops both online and off tend to like the &#8220;glossy&#8221; nature of heavily post-processed pictures, but many other people like to see genuine &#8220;organic&#8221; pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Milthorpe</title>
		<link>http://www.smashandpeas.com/36-stunning-examples-of-landscape-photography/#comment-5045</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Milthorpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 19:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smashandpeas.com/?p=1629#comment-5045</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great comment Jason!

It could be interesting to to do a survey on that to actually find the answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great comment Jason!</p>
<p>It could be interesting to to do a survey on that to actually find the answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.smashandpeas.com/36-stunning-examples-of-landscape-photography/#comment-5044</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 18:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smashandpeas.com/?p=1629#comment-5044</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s very interesting to read the comments on these images. There is a clear dichotomy between  photographers that understand what their equipment is capable of, and the novice that believes any vivid images are &quot;shopped&quot;.

It begs the question: If you were to show a group of young people a collection of Ansel Adams images, without using his name, how many would think they were done in Photoshop?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very interesting to read the comments on these images. There is a clear dichotomy between  photographers that understand what their equipment is capable of, and the novice that believes any vivid images are &#8220;shopped&#8221;.</p>
<p>It begs the question: If you were to show a group of young people a collection of Ansel Adams images, without using his name, how many would think they were done in Photoshop?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
